Comments for Library Congress

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by Oddonan

Oddonan — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:33:26 +0000

@russkie69
May I ask you a simple question?

What is not an Art?(from your own point of view)

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by Ofbladesfire

Ofbladesfire — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:02:20 +0000

Search – “NEAR RUIN – THE MASTERPEICE” Its a song about modern art.

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by Rationalific

Rationalific — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:56:42 +0000

@chandru1103 It’s funny that you call people ignorant that you don’t even know. Guess what…people don’t have to be taught “beauty”. They have to be taught to accept pretentious crap that is easily manufactured, though. I know a thing or two about art, try calling me ignorant. Here’s a fun fact – the name “mobile” was affixed to these objects by Marcel Duchamp – most famous for the toilet he bought, sent to an exhibition, and called art.

The mobile, though, was the best thing in there.

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by Rationalific

Rationalific — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:05:17 +0000

@PGHughes “It has taken me many years to arrive at a more sympathetic understanding of the demanding perspectives of 20th century art.” and “[Neoclassicism] is ultimately sterile in its certainties”

Can anyone find in this 2-year old comment the brainwashing that this user was subjected to? It’s easily discernible to me. Each person has a style of speech and writing. Like some brainwashed people using Biblical phraseology to sound morally superior, this (many year) brainwashing is apparent.

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by KhagarBalugrak

KhagarBalugrak — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:59:26 +0000

LMAO the stuff at the National Gallery of Art is utter shit. I guess I shouldn’t be laughing since all this shit is costing innocent civilians millions of dollars a year in upkeep, but seriously, that anyone would ever consider almost any of this art is laughable.

But my jaw dropped when I saw the Library of Congress. It looked like something straight out of heaven.

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by lysol5555

lysol5555 — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:35:51 +0000

@chandru1103 you are comparing this shit fucking art to advanced Calculus?? Just because you say something is hard doesn’t make it so. Tell me, What the fuck is a circle and a line? Why does it deserve to be in the National Gallery. I don’t give a shit if people do it in their own time, but to put it in the national gallery is a SHAME!

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by ScrapedfromSealings

ScrapedfromSealings — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:01:51 +0000

@lysol5555 Hello, I’m sorry I couldn’t respond. But the Fascist who owns this account blocked me from sharing my opinion, which only proves their ignorance of art discourse.Yes. The work made today is the most complex work ever made by humanity. In intent and in process. Those “lines and circles” are works of minimalism, a movement about refinement of formalistic principles into a universal language of simple form and color. The work was groundbreaking for its age, hence why its in the Nat Gall.

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by ScrapedfromSealings

ScrapedfromSealings — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:02:33 +0000

@Rationalific Is art purely about beauty? I had no idea that art was hard-pressed by those parameters. And maybe the ease of manufacturing is , in its own right, a part of the intent of the work and something that is worth looking into as a part of how the work should be read….

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by ScrapedfromSealings

ScrapedfromSealings — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:57:57 +0000

@JooJooBnutz Isn’t that a good thing that anyone could make it? Doesn’t that mean art is less elitist? And therefore more relatable to a broader audience instead of less. I think you need to rethink how you approach its context, if anyone can do it, then its perfect cause everyone has the ability to express themselves through the art context. Thats a good thing, everyone should create, so that maybe we will have less overt destruction in the world, no?

Comment on Modern Art Nonsense vs. The Library of Congress by lysol5555

lysol5555 — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:35:16 +0000

@ScrapedfromSealings Don’t compare art to Science, science is objective and academic, art is subjective and abstract art is definitely not academic. If you want to be brained wash and feel smart by liking abstract art, go ahead. Just know that it’s a bunch of bullshit, and 90% of people agree.